Philosophy of Science
- Course
- PHIL601 - Philosophy of Science
- Department
- Institute of Graduate Studies and Research
- Course Type
- Course
- Status
- Required
- Language
- English
- Credit
- 3
- ECTS
- 8
- T+P+L
- 3 + 0 + 0
- Course Coordinator(s)
- Assoc. Prof. Dr. Nusret Sinan EVCAN
- Prerequisite
- -
- Keywords
Course Description
This course will follow three main paths: Firstly it will introduce philosophy to doctoral students. The meaning of philosophy, its scope, its sub-branches and its different schools will be the subject topic of the first weeks. Then the course will focus on the relation of philosophy with the sources of knowledge and different sciences. Here, Rationalism, Empiricism and Intuitionism will be covered during the following weeks. In the remaining weeks the course will concentrate on philosophy of science and scientific ethics. Logical positivism, paradigm changes, falsificationism, the questions of “what is science”, “what is pseudo-science?”, “what is the relation between theory and reality?” are amongst topics that will be covered. Finally, the course will concentrate on ethical theories and will particularly cover scientific ethics.
Philosophy of Science
Evaluation Tools (Active Term)
No evaluation items have been defined.
Course outcomes
No course outcomes have been defined yet.
Course Syllabus
| Week | Topic |
|---|---|
| Week 1 | Philosophy's Definition and Scopes |
| Week 2 | Sources of knowledge: Scepticism, Rationalism, Empiricism, Intiutionism |
| Week 3 | Philosophy of Science and Epistemology |
| Week 4 | Ontology and Metaphysics |
| Week 5 | Different Theories of Philosophy of Science |
| Week 6 | Logical Positivism |
| Week 7 | Thomas Kuhn and Change of Paradigms |
| Week 8 | Karl Popper and Falsificationism |
| Week 9 | Kant and mixed theories |
| Week 10 | Pragmatism |
| Week 11 | Ethics in Science |
| Week 12 | Ethics in Science |
| Week 13 | Research Ethics |
| Week 14 | Research Ethics |
| Week 15 | Summary and Article Analysis |
Reference Books & Course Materials
- 01 Richard Boyd, Philip Gasper, and J.D. Trout, The philosophy of Science, MIT Press, 1991
- 02 Manuel Velasquez, Philosophy: A text with readings, Cengage Learning, 2009
Learning Outcomes
No learning outcomes have been defined.
Program Outcomes
- Based on master's-level qualifications, be able to develop and deepen current and advanced knowledge in the field at the level of expertise through original thinking and/or research, and achieve original conceptualizations that contribute innovation to the field.
- Should be able to comprehend the interdisciplinary interactions related to their field and employ specialized knowledge to analyze, synthesize, and evaluate new and complex ideas, leading to original conclusions.
- Should be able to systematically evaluate and apply new knowledge in their field.
- Should be able to develop innovative ideas, methods, designs, and/or applications that contribute to the advancement of the field, or apply existing ideas, methods, designs, and/or applications to a different field. Should be able to investigate, comprehend, design, adapt, and implement original research topics.
- hould be able to critically analyze, synthesize, and evaluate new and complex ideas.
- Should demonstrate advanced proficiency in the application of research methods in studies related to their field.
- Should be able to independently conduct original research that develops innovative ideas, methods, designs, and/or applications, or applies existing ideas, methods, designs, and/or applications to a different field, thereby contributing to the advancement of their field.
- Should be able to extend the frontiers of knowledge in their field by publishing at least one scientific article in a national and/or international peer-reviewed journal and/or by producing or critically interpreting an original work.
- Should be able to demonstrate leadership in addressing original and interdisciplinary problems within complex environments.
- Should be able to develop innovative ideas and methods in their field through the effective use of higher-order cognitive skills, including creative and critical thinking, problem-solving, and decision-making.
- Should be able to critically analyze and enhance social relationships and the norms that shape these relationships, and lead actions toward their transformation when necessary.
- Should be able to defend original viewpoints when discussing issues related to their field with experts and establish effective communication that demonstrates their expertise and competence in the field.
- Should be able to conduct advanced written, oral, and visual communication and participate in discussions using at least one foreign language at the C1 level of the European Language Portfolio.
- Should be able to contribute to the development and sustainability of a knowledge society by disseminating scientific, technological, social, and cultural advancements related to their field.
- Should be able to engage in effective interactions by employing strategic decision-making processes to address and solve problems encountered in their field.
- Should be able to contribute to solving social, scientific, cultural, and ethical issues related to their field and promote the advancement of these values.
- Based on master's-level qualifications, be able to develop and deepen current and advanced knowledge in the field at the level of expertise through original thinking and/or research, and achieve original conceptualizations that contribute innovation to the field.
Po-Lo Matrix
The PO-LO matrix has not been populated yet.