Skip to main content
TR

Philosophy of Science

Course
PHIL601 - Philosophy of Science
Department
Institute of Graduate Studies and Research
Course Type
Course
Status
Required
Language
English
Credit
3
ECTS
8
T+P+L
3 + 0 + 0
Course Coordinator(s)
Assoc. Prof. Dr. Nusret Sinan EVCAN
Prerequisite
-
Keywords

Course Description

This course will follow three main paths: Firstly it will introduce philosophy to doctoral students. The meaning of philosophy, its scope, its sub-branches and its different schools will be the subject topic of the first weeks. Then the course will focus on the relation of philosophy with the sources of knowledge and different sciences. Here, Rationalism, Empiricism and Intuitionism will be covered during the following weeks. In the remaining weeks the course will concentrate on philosophy of science and scientific ethics. Logical positivism, paradigm changes, falsificationism, the questions of “what is science”, “what is pseudo-science?”, “what is the relation between theory and reality?” are amongst topics that will be covered. Finally, the course will concentrate on ethical theories and will particularly cover scientific ethics.

Philosophy of Science

Evaluation Tools (Active Term)

No evaluation items have been defined.

Course outcomes

No course outcomes have been defined yet.

Course Syllabus

Week Topic
Week 1 Philosophy's Definition and Scopes
Week 2 Sources of knowledge: Scepticism, Rationalism, Empiricism, Intiutionism
Week 3 Philosophy of Science and Epistemology
Week 4 Ontology and Metaphysics
Week 5 Different Theories of Philosophy of Science
Week 6 Logical Positivism
Week 7 Thomas Kuhn and Change of Paradigms
Week 8 Karl Popper and Falsificationism
Week 9 Kant and mixed theories
Week 10 Pragmatism
Week 11 Ethics in Science
Week 12 Ethics in Science
Week 13 Research Ethics
Week 14 Research Ethics
Week 15 Summary and Article Analysis

Reference Books & Course Materials

  1. 01 Richard Boyd, Philip Gasper, and J.D. Trout, The philosophy of Science, MIT Press, 1991
  2. 02 Manuel Velasquez, Philosophy: A text with readings, Cengage Learning, 2009

Learning Outcomes

No learning outcomes have been defined.

Program Outcomes

  1. Based on master's-level qualifications, be able to develop and deepen current and advanced knowledge in the field at the level of expertise through original thinking and/or research, and achieve original conceptualizations that contribute innovation to the field.
  2. Should be able to comprehend the interdisciplinary interactions related to their field and employ specialized knowledge to analyze, synthesize, and evaluate new and complex ideas, leading to original conclusions.
  3. Should be able to systematically evaluate and apply new knowledge in their field.
  4. Should be able to develop innovative ideas, methods, designs, and/or applications that contribute to the advancement of the field, or apply existing ideas, methods, designs, and/or applications to a different field. Should be able to investigate, comprehend, design, adapt, and implement original research topics.
  5. hould be able to critically analyze, synthesize, and evaluate new and complex ideas.
  6. Should demonstrate advanced proficiency in the application of research methods in studies related to their field.
  7. Should be able to independently conduct original research that develops innovative ideas, methods, designs, and/or applications, or applies existing ideas, methods, designs, and/or applications to a different field, thereby contributing to the advancement of their field.
  8. Should be able to extend the frontiers of knowledge in their field by publishing at least one scientific article in a national and/or international peer-reviewed journal and/or by producing or critically interpreting an original work.
  9. Should be able to demonstrate leadership in addressing original and interdisciplinary problems within complex environments.
  10. Should be able to develop innovative ideas and methods in their field through the effective use of higher-order cognitive skills, including creative and critical thinking, problem-solving, and decision-making.
  11. Should be able to critically analyze and enhance social relationships and the norms that shape these relationships, and lead actions toward their transformation when necessary.
  12. Should be able to defend original viewpoints when discussing issues related to their field with experts and establish effective communication that demonstrates their expertise and competence in the field.
  13. Should be able to conduct advanced written, oral, and visual communication and participate in discussions using at least one foreign language at the C1 level of the European Language Portfolio.
  14. Should be able to contribute to the development and sustainability of a knowledge society by disseminating scientific, technological, social, and cultural advancements related to their field.
  15. Should be able to engage in effective interactions by employing strategic decision-making processes to address and solve problems encountered in their field.
  16. Should be able to contribute to solving social, scientific, cultural, and ethical issues related to their field and promote the advancement of these values.
  17. Based on master's-level qualifications, be able to develop and deepen current and advanced knowledge in the field at the level of expertise through original thinking and/or research, and achieve original conceptualizations that contribute innovation to the field.

Po-Lo Matrix

The PO-LO matrix has not been populated yet.